Liberty and Virtue

A person who experiences same sex attraction and who endeavors to live chastely in accordance with his religious beliefs keeps an eye out for examples of gay activists' (1) showing intolerance and hatred of traditional religious and moral beliefs and believers, (2) attempting to deny freedom of speech, assembly and religion to others, and (3) trying to cause the government to impose liberal views on sexual morality on society. Other stuff of interest to blogger may also occasionally be posted.

Gay activists do not speak for all those who experience same sex attraction!

Not all those with SSA reject traditional sexual morality!

Not all those with SSA support promiscuity!

Not all those with SSA believe the gay activist ideology of “gay pride”!

Not all those with SSA believe in making their sex drive their primary public identity!

Not all those with SSA support public indecency in “gay pride” parades!

Not all those with SSA support government promotion of homosexual activity!

Not all those with SSA support same sex marriage!

Not all those with SSA support biased teaching in public schools on homosexual matters!

Not all those with SSA demonize traditional religious believers!

Not all those with SSA wish to deny basic freedoms of speech, religion and association to those who disagree with the gay activists’ ideology and agenda!

Christian charity for persons does not require affirmation of sinful or immoral activity!

Sunday, June 25, 2006

Kicking the "Christianists"

A most excellent critique of Andrew Sullivan's hatemongering and pontificating.

Charles S.

Thursday, June 22, 2006

Joseph Bottum on l'Affaire Robert Smith

Robert Smith is the USA's answer to Rocco Buttiglione, it would seem.

Charles S.

Sunday, June 18, 2006

Gays Have Emerged as the New Protected Class in America

John Leo on the Governor Ehrlich/Robert Smith affair:


Ehrlich's third adjective, "unacceptable," is surely debatable. Did he mean that all members of Washington-area boards are required to approve of homosexuality, or just that they must suppress any non-positive views during TV discussions of same-sex marriage?


Why didn't Gov. Erhrlich simply say that he disagrees with Smith, but considers him an excellent public servant, which the Washington Post coverage of the story makes clear he is? The answer is that in Washington, and among the elites everywhere, approval of homosexuality is now mandatory. In the old days, employees were fired for being gay. Now they are far more likely to get fired for failing to approve homosexuality or for some remark that the gay lobby resents.


Charles S.

Friday, June 16, 2006

Free Speech Watch: Maryland

Ehrlich appointee fired over remark

Charles S.

Thursday, June 15, 2006

Gay Activist Intolerance Watch: Massachusetts

Seven-Year-Old Beaten at School For Father's Stand Against Homosexual Activism

Charles S.

Saturday, June 10, 2006

Freedom of Religious Speech

John M. Templeton Jr., M.D. has an important piece in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette:

Some preachers deeply believe that homosexuality is a sin. What if 'hate speech' laws prosecute them for saying so?

Charles S.

Sunday, June 04, 2006

Public School Indoctrination Watch: Canada

Gov't Agrees to Mandatory Homosexual Curriculum with No Opt-Out for Students or Parents

Charles S.

Thursday, June 01, 2006

Freedom of Speech Watch: Canada

Canadian Prof Faces Human Rights Complaint Over Religious Views on Homosexuality

Charles S.

<< # St. Blog's Parish ? >>