Liberty and Virtue

A person who experiences same sex attraction and who endeavors to live chastely in accordance with his religious beliefs keeps an eye out for examples of gay activists' (1) showing intolerance and hatred of traditional religious and moral beliefs and believers, (2) attempting to deny freedom of speech, assembly and religion to others, and (3) trying to cause the government to impose liberal views on sexual morality on society. Other stuff of interest to blogger may also occasionally be posted.

Gay activists do not speak for all those who experience same sex attraction!

Not all those with SSA reject traditional sexual morality!

Not all those with SSA support promiscuity!

Not all those with SSA believe the gay activist ideology of “gay pride”!

Not all those with SSA believe in making their sex drive their primary public identity!

Not all those with SSA support public indecency in “gay pride” parades!

Not all those with SSA support government promotion of homosexual activity!

Not all those with SSA support same sex marriage!

Not all those with SSA support biased teaching in public schools on homosexual matters!

Not all those with SSA demonize traditional religious believers!

Not all those with SSA wish to deny basic freedoms of speech, religion and association to those who disagree with the gay activists’ ideology and agenda!

Christian charity for persons does not require affirmation of sinful or immoral activity!

Monday, March 28, 2005

Religious Believers to be "Purged" from Conservativism?

Gay activist zealot Andrew Sullivan continues his campaign of hatred and demonization of traditional religious believers, stating: "The important point is that religious zealotry cannot be incorporated into conservatism. It is the nemesis of conservatism. And it has to be purged in order for conservatism to be revived." The intolerant Sullivan, whose primary commitment to obtaining affirmation of homosexual activity from the government and society at large has trumped any putative conservative principles he might have ever espoused, presumably would define religious zealotry as anyone with sincere religious and moral beliefs on the sinfulness of homosexual activity and, apparently, the sanctity of human life. I find it incredibly arrogant for Mr. Sullivan, who supported Mr. Kerry for president last November, and whose conservative bona fides is as eminently suspect in my book as the so-called "Log Cabin Republicans," to attempt to redefine conservatism so as to exclude traditional religious believers. I suppose Senators Schumer, Kerry and Kennedy, all of whom support a litmus test barring traditional Christian believers from the judiciary, would be considered conservative under the proposed Sullivan test.

Charles S.


Post a Comment

<< Home

<< # St. Blog's Parish ? >>