Liberty and Virtue

A person who experiences same sex attraction and who endeavors to live chastely in accordance with his religious beliefs keeps an eye out for examples of gay activists' (1) showing intolerance and hatred of traditional religious and moral beliefs and believers, (2) attempting to deny freedom of speech, assembly and religion to others, and (3) trying to cause the government to impose liberal views on sexual morality on society. Other stuff of interest to blogger may also occasionally be posted.

Gay activists do not speak for all those who experience same sex attraction!

Not all those with SSA reject traditional sexual morality!

Not all those with SSA support promiscuity!

Not all those with SSA believe the gay activist ideology of “gay pride”!

Not all those with SSA believe in making their sex drive their primary public identity!

Not all those with SSA support public indecency in “gay pride” parades!

Not all those with SSA support government promotion of homosexual activity!

Not all those with SSA support same sex marriage!

Not all those with SSA support biased teaching in public schools on homosexual matters!

Not all those with SSA demonize traditional religious believers!

Not all those with SSA wish to deny basic freedoms of speech, religion and association to those who disagree with the gay activists’ ideology and agenda!

Christian charity for persons does not require affirmation of sinful or immoral activity!

Tuesday, January 18, 2005

Gay History Month to 'Out' Newton and Nightingale

As with so much of the depressing gay activist ideology currently being shoved down students' throats in public schools, this whole trend of arbitrarily identifying historical figures as "gay" or "lesbian" is so wrong on so many levels. First, to the extent that there is no clear evidence one way or another about a person, it is slanderous to make an accusation of homosexual proclivity when the person around is not around to defend himself or herself. Second, a famous person sexual activity or proclivity may not have the slightest thing to do with that person's historical achievement. Should we celebrate some famous person solely because they had red hair? Third, even if a person did experience same sex attraction, they may not have acted on it, or wished it to be publicly known or a publicly identifying characteristic, or would support an ideology that glorifies homosexual activity rather than seeing it as sinful. At least one known historical figure who experienced same sex attraction, Oscar Wilde, died fully repentant of sinful homosexual behavior in the bosom of Mother Church. Tchaikovsky, about whom there have also been rumors, may have had similar religious qualms about homosexual activity. We have no way of knowing whether any of these historical figures alleged to have experienced same sex attraction would, even if they had such a proclivity, have consented to becoming poster children to the modern gay activist ideological movement. I would speculate that a number of them might just be horrified to see that their names are being used to push the gay agenda.

Charles S.


Post a Comment

<< Home

<< # St. Blog's Parish ? >>