Liberty and Virtue

A person who experiences same sex attraction and who endeavors to live chastely in accordance with his religious beliefs keeps an eye out for examples of gay activists' (1) showing intolerance and hatred of traditional religious and moral beliefs and believers, (2) attempting to deny freedom of speech, assembly and religion to others, and (3) trying to cause the government to impose liberal views on sexual morality on society. Other stuff of interest to blogger may also occasionally be posted.

Gay activists do not speak for all those who experience same sex attraction!

Not all those with SSA reject traditional sexual morality!

Not all those with SSA support promiscuity!

Not all those with SSA believe the gay activist ideology of “gay pride”!

Not all those with SSA believe in making their sex drive their primary public identity!

Not all those with SSA support public indecency in “gay pride” parades!

Not all those with SSA support government promotion of homosexual activity!

Not all those with SSA support same sex marriage!

Not all those with SSA support biased teaching in public schools on homosexual matters!

Not all those with SSA demonize traditional religious believers!

Not all those with SSA wish to deny basic freedoms of speech, religion and association to those who disagree with the gay activists’ ideology and agenda!

Christian charity for persons does not require affirmation of sinful or immoral activity!

Thursday, December 16, 2004

Zeal of Approval: Robert Novak Comes Unhinged

Andrew Sullivan takes issue with Robert Novak's criticism of the White House for supposedly snubbing Mr. Buttiglione, mentioned previously in this blog. To his credit, Mr. Sullivan does state that he believes Buttiglione to be unfairly treated by the European Parliament. That doesn't prevent Mr. Sullivan, however, from making some wonted gratuitous slurs such as wrongly accusing Robert Novak, as one who opposes the changing of the millenia-old definition of marriage to include same sex couples, of being primarily motivated by "discrimination," and using demonizing labels for traditional religious believers, such as "theoconservatives":

Does Novak agree that public officials should never discriminate against homosexual citizens? Silly question. The whole point of the columnist's favored social policies is to discriminate against homosexuals. ...

And it says something about the current hubris and parochialism among the theoconservative right that a leading columnist like Novak should think he should.

Charles S.


Post a Comment

<< Home

<< # St. Blog's Parish ? >>