Liberty and Virtue

A person who experiences same sex attraction and who endeavors to live chastely in accordance with his religious beliefs keeps an eye out for examples of gay activists' (1) showing intolerance and hatred of traditional religious and moral beliefs and believers, (2) attempting to deny freedom of speech, assembly and religion to others, and (3) trying to cause the government to impose liberal views on sexual morality on society. Other stuff of interest to blogger may also occasionally be posted.

Gay activists do not speak for all those who experience same sex attraction!

Not all those with SSA reject traditional sexual morality!

Not all those with SSA support promiscuity!

Not all those with SSA believe the gay activist ideology of “gay pride”!

Not all those with SSA believe in making their sex drive their primary public identity!

Not all those with SSA support public indecency in “gay pride” parades!

Not all those with SSA support government promotion of homosexual activity!

Not all those with SSA support same sex marriage!

Not all those with SSA support biased teaching in public schools on homosexual matters!

Not all those with SSA demonize traditional religious believers!

Not all those with SSA wish to deny basic freedoms of speech, religion and association to those who disagree with the gay activists’ ideology and agenda!

Christian charity for persons does not require affirmation of sinful or immoral activity!

Thursday, December 02, 2004

Church Recruiting New Members With TV Ad

From the above article:

The liberal-leaning UCC began the $1.7 million, 3 1/2-week advertising campaign on Wednesday. The 30-second ad shows a muscular bouncer working a rope line outside a handsome but nameless church, deciding who may enter.

``No, step aside, please,'' he says to two men holding hands.

Across the screen comes the message, ``Jesus didn't turn people away. Neither do we.'' The final scene shows two women embracing.

Me: No Christian Church excludes those with homosexual proclivities, but all Christian Churches have historically called certain sexual activity, namely sex outside of the context of a heterosexual marriage, sinful. So is the UCC saying that to be "inclusive", we must not only welcome the sinner but eliminate the idea of sin? That would be the logical conclusion of what they are suggesting. And their reference to Jesus is simply ludicrous. Jesus did NOT say that there was no such thing as sin. He called all to Himself, but He also called for repentance and for sinners to sin no more.

Charles S.


Post a Comment

<< Home

<< # St. Blog's Parish ? >>