Liberty and Virtue

A person who experiences same sex attraction and who endeavors to live chastely in accordance with his religious beliefs keeps an eye out for examples of gay activists' (1) showing intolerance and hatred of traditional religious and moral beliefs and believers, (2) attempting to deny freedom of speech, assembly and religion to others, and (3) trying to cause the government to impose liberal views on sexual morality on society. Other stuff of interest to blogger may also occasionally be posted.

Gay activists do not speak for all those who experience same sex attraction!

Not all those with SSA reject traditional sexual morality!

Not all those with SSA support promiscuity!

Not all those with SSA believe the gay activist ideology of “gay pride”!

Not all those with SSA believe in making their sex drive their primary public identity!

Not all those with SSA support public indecency in “gay pride” parades!

Not all those with SSA support government promotion of homosexual activity!

Not all those with SSA support same sex marriage!

Not all those with SSA support biased teaching in public schools on homosexual matters!

Not all those with SSA demonize traditional religious believers!

Not all those with SSA wish to deny basic freedoms of speech, religion and association to those who disagree with the gay activists’ ideology and agenda!

Christian charity for persons does not require affirmation of sinful or immoral activity!

Wednesday, November 03, 2004

Voters in 11 States Reject Gay Marriage

Everywhere (including Oregon!) a state constitutional amendment was on the ballot to define marriage as being between a man and a woman, the voters chose to uphold traditional marriage. I believe in the basic decency of the American people and therefore interpret the vote as a widespread rejection of government promotion of homosexual activity, a moral issue about which many feel and have a right to feel differently from the liberal establishment. Tolerance is one thing, but government affirmation of homosexual activity is quite another thing. The voters are also saying that unelected judges should not unilaterally change the definition of marriage to impose the gay activist agenda on society based on ambiguous wording and vague constitutional theories that can be twisted to justify almost anything the judges wish to accomplish. I do not believe that the vote demonstrates hatred or intolerance of those with same sex attraction as persons, although that certainly might have been the case with some voters, and the gay activists will certainly portray this as the voters' primary motivation.

Charles S.


Post a Comment

<< Home

<< # St. Blog's Parish ? >>