Liberty and Virtue

A person who experiences same sex attraction and who endeavors to live chastely in accordance with his religious beliefs keeps an eye out for examples of gay activists' (1) showing intolerance and hatred of traditional religious and moral beliefs and believers, (2) attempting to deny freedom of speech, assembly and religion to others, and (3) trying to cause the government to impose liberal views on sexual morality on society. Other stuff of interest to blogger may also occasionally be posted.

Gay activists do not speak for all those who experience same sex attraction!

Not all those with SSA reject traditional sexual morality!

Not all those with SSA support promiscuity!

Not all those with SSA believe the gay activist ideology of “gay pride”!

Not all those with SSA believe in making their sex drive their primary public identity!

Not all those with SSA support public indecency in “gay pride” parades!

Not all those with SSA support government promotion of homosexual activity!

Not all those with SSA support same sex marriage!

Not all those with SSA support biased teaching in public schools on homosexual matters!

Not all those with SSA demonize traditional religious believers!

Not all those with SSA wish to deny basic freedoms of speech, religion and association to those who disagree with the gay activists’ ideology and agenda!

Christian charity for persons does not require affirmation of sinful or immoral activity!

Saturday, November 27, 2004

A Tactical Regrouping

Domenico Bettinelli makes a good point about same sex marriage and civil unions, referring to this article:

Homosexual activists have apparently realized that the push for gay marriage after the Massachusetts court decision was a tactical mistake. Rather than push Americans down the slippery slope as liberal social engineers have successfully down over the past 40 years, they moved too fast and alienated most Americans, resulting in numerous states passing constitutional amendments preventing the fiction called gay marriage.

Instead, they’re regrouping, backing up, and pushing for same-sex civil unions, which is marriage in every benefit and right but without the name. And then once that’s in place for a few year, they can then say,” We have marriage in everything but name anyway, so why not give us the name, too?"

“Whether it is called civil unions or it is called domestic partnerships or whether it is called something else,” [ACLU attorney] Choe said, the arrangements must “contain the full range of legal protections that married couples enjoy."

The sad part is that many conservatives and even bishops have as much as conceded civil unions, so when the liberals all shift their focus, it will probably go through without much opposition.

Charles S.


Blogger ELC said...

I wrote this a year ago: "I have always thought 'civil unions' for 'gays' to be a sham: the effects would be 'marriage' in everything but name. And, sooner or later (probably sooner) somebody will go to court and find 4 out of 7 judges who will decide that since a 'civil union' is a 'marriage' in everything but name then it's somehow, someway 'unconstitutional' to not call a 'civil union' a 'marriage'."

November 29, 2004 at 4:47 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Concern Fresh Wind offers a construction investment for different tariff plans. Today , overcame the recent financial crisis, more began to wonder where better to invest. According to conclusions of many of the leading the best analysts, one of the most spheres of investment, is a . It is well known Everyone knows that the construction of less exposed to the risk of falling prices, in addition a given that, property has always enjoyed , and will be in demand. Even the economic crisis did not recaptured removed the desire for people to buy their own property. Therefore, investment in construction will always remain relevant and profitable.

Fwit.Biz: [url=]where to invest money[/url]

May 27, 2013 at 9:02 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

<< # St. Blog's Parish ? >>